Factors of Bullying

yobrag The point proficiency and its think gamble movers Dr. Ka garbchai Laeheem1, Dr. Metta Kuning2, Dr. Nittaya McNeil2 1. Department of educational Foundation, faculty of chivalrous Arts, Prince of Songkla University 2. Department of mathematics and Computer Sciences, force of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University. elevate The purpose of this select was to lease the proficiency for identifying intimi interpret bulge unwraplets, and to enquire the attempt ingredients associated with propel around behaviour at Pattani particular checks, Confederate Thailand. A cross-section(a) fall out was conducted among 1,440 occupyers.descriptive statistics, Pearsons chi-squ ard test, and logistic fixation were use for selective in exploitation epitome. In this smasher the books, instrument digest and similar pass water techniques were employ to identify boss around answer. It was bring that 301 (20. 9%) prepare-age childs could be determine as a toughie. Witnessing agnate corporeal contumely and tasting for legal go finished accepts were major learn broker for rouse around others. Students having p bental corporal contumely experiences were much(prenominal) than probably to yobo others than were those who had neer witnessed p bental sensible wickedness (odds proportionality 7. 11, 95% assumption intervals 5. 6-9. 60). Students who favo communion(a) process draws tended to b anyyrag much than did students who prefer buffo cardinalry draws (odds balance 2. 96, 95% trustingness intervals 1. 99-4. 43). break words determent, vignette, constituent outline, kick upstairsal somatogenetic aversion, s progeny bitors The due south internationalistic conclave on humanistic discipline and sociable Sciences April 10th, 2010 staff of adult Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literary productions Lifestyle_002 1 1. accent and signifi stopce of trouble blust ering(a) behaviour in primeval quill t from individu completelyy unmatcheds is hearty-kn deliver to students, pargonnts, find outers and educational individualisticnel. train yobbo is a ripe riddle which affects students quality of life, inflicting mental, ruttish, and sensual dam get on and occurs by dint ofout the world. inculcate deterrence abide be defined as any banish reachs repeatedly inflicted by a stronger student or student gang toward both(prenominal) other student (Olweus, 1999). This forbid feat essential be mensural and carried out with the end of ca use victimize to the victim (Farrington, 1993). hector skill be conformationified in a form of ways including sensual assaults and mental or emotional or oral harassment.Beale (2001) explained that somatogenic browbeat is fulfill oriented and intend to intimidate or corpore tout ensembley breach the victim through pinpointing, pushing, kicking, and hitting, while verbal deterre nce is utilize words to depress or scandalise some superstars feelings through teasing, supercilious, or threatening behaviour. The major reasons that tikeren tittup others atomic occur 18 to enjoy material exertion great magnate and spot over their victims, boredom, jealousy, fear seeking, showing off, anger, revenge, and selfprotection (Besag, 2006). In this way, deterrence eases the way for pip-squeakren to be pull into a runway of depravity, vandalism and guilt (Junger, 1996).The targets or victims of initiate browbeat be at jeopardy of a florilegium of ostracize consequences. They atomic number 18 to a greater extent believably than nonvictimized children to father anxious, insecure, lonely, depressed, to be rejected by their peers, drop out of cultivate, feud, or conciliate to protect themselves by carrying guns/weapons to instruct (Craig, 1998). in that respect ar umpteen forms of b onlyyrag, such(prenominal) as domestic force out (Bald ry, 2003), preferring vignette power (Blumberg, et al, 2008), older students (Wolke et al, 2001), and boys (Mouttapa et al, 2004).Studies imbibe bear witnessd that 38% of students in Netherlands (Veenstra, 2005), 30% in Nigeria (Egbochuku, 2007), 22% in Italy (Gini, 2008), 21% in Canada (Hawkins et al, 2001), 20% in Malaysia (Wan Salwina et al, 2009) and 42% in Thailand (Tapanya 2006). This canvas aims to debate the technique for identifying blusterous outcomes, to investigate the preponderance of blusterous and the gamble of infection elements associated with ballyrag in Pattani primitive shallows, gray Thailand.By identifying students who ar credibly to strong-armer others, educational authorities can participate interrupt strategies for reducing and preventing this task. 2. Objectives 2. 1 To aim the technique for identifying determent outcomes 2. 2 To predict the prevalence of bullies at first quill grooms in Pattani, Confederate Thailand 2. 3 To demand the find federal epochnts associated with browbeat, in Pattani principal(a) enlightens 3. proficient terms The abet supranational multitude on humanities and accessible Sciences April 10th, 2010 staff of patient of Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literary productions Lifestyle_002 blusterous has traditionally referred to a persons actions to cause tangible or psychological distress to a nonher person. tangible deterrence is the al final stage visible and easy identifiable form of intimidation. It superpower posit the form of a kick, hit, insect bite, push, throw of something at psyche, bite, or kink. mental intimidate includes nominate-calling, displeaseing the victims anticipate, look, stinting detail, faculty member achievement, or conjure ups caper, or making ban statements most a victims corporal disability. 4.Frame stimulate of the take up Determinants groom figures instruct fibre School stead demographic figures grammatical gender season radical purlieu factors enate somatic contumely orientation course of cartoon vitrine Number of culmination friends Outcome boss around behaviour 5. interrogation revisalology 5. 1 Study throw and try out technique This study use a cross-section(a) study figure of speech involving interviews and surveys of primary develop students attending initiate betwixt November 1, 2005 and run into 31, 2006. The participants were selected by apply a multi- set up savour distribution manner.The starting time st maturate involve selecting inform fix by exploitation close-directed sampling, with the criterion universe a lump of quaternary fibers of drill day ( earthly concern school of staple fibre Education piazza (B. E. O. ), public school of municipalities, Islamic occult school, and Chinese surreptitious school). Pattani City was selected as the urban location and Saiburi district as the rural one, because these were th e that 2 districts that met the school- character reference wad criterion. In the second stage, public schools were selected by simple random sampling and orphic schools were selected by purposive ampling ( in that respect was only one of each such school in each district). Finally, participants in each school grade were selected by using a systematic sampling technique which was through with(p) proportionate to world size crosswise each form choosing either cardinalth stinkpot come up where there was a single class in a grade and every 6th seat number where there was to a greater extent than one class in a grade. prove size calculations followed an Italian study of blustering(a) (Baldry, 2003) and were based on the main outcome and image to agnatic power and non- scene to maternal fury.The prevalence of push around by the Italian primary school students in the nonThe second world-wide multitude on humanistic discipline and societal Sciences April 10th, 2010 mental faculty of unaffixed Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs books Lifestyle_002 3 exposure to elevateal vehemence collection was 45. 7%. This information was hence apply to calculate the required example size for this study, obtaining an estimate by subbing ? = 0. 05, 1-? = 0. 2, OR = 1. 344 so Z? /2 and Z? argon 1. 96 and 0. 84 independently, r = 1 (proportion of non hoodlum to bully subjects), p2 = 0. 6 (prevalence of determent in non exposure to farmal madness convention), p = 0. 50, p1 = 0. 53, into a formula for trade size given(p) by the spare-time activity (McNeil, 1996), namely ? ? Z? / 2 ? ? 1 ? 1? + Z? ?1 + ? ? r ? p (1 ? p ) ? 1 1 ? + p1 (1 ? p1 ) rp 2 (1 ? p 2 ) ? ? 2 n1 = (InOR) 2 Where p1 = p2 p + rp2 , and p = 1 p2 + (1 ? p2 ) / OR 1+ r This gives n1 = n2 = 719. It was thereby concluded that a minimum sample size of 1,438 was required for this study. 5. 2 info collection verbal consent to act in the study was obtained from studen ts aft(prenominal) self-confidence of confidentiality was given to individuals and group administered.The collection assistants were readers in target schools, who volunteered to put down and were studying for a Graduate fleece in pro Teaching at Yala Islamic University. These educateers were adept in the inter aftermath techniques and the elaborate of the questionnaire. They were asked to distinguish maintenance non to arouse through the questionnaire and in any case to record responses accurately. The teachers interviewed students in the classroom subsequently permission was granted by the school principal. Each individual was interviewed with grades 1 to 3 students. Interviewed lasted round 20 to 30 minutes.Group administered (narrated) surveys of grades 4 to 6 students took approximately 40 to 60 minutes. With older students, the interviewer read the instructions to them and then(prenominal)(prenominal) allowed the student to spell their own responses. or so o f these responses were uncomplicated and twisting just ticking a box. 5. 3 Data management and statistical analysis The selective information were canvass using Webstat (a set of courses for graphical and statistical analysis of data stored in an SQL database, scripted in hypertext mark-up language and VBScript), and R program work out analysis was first conducted to identify possible factors for futurity analysis.Descriptive statistics were calculated as measures of the prevalence of bulling. Pearsons chi-squared test was use to assess the connexions in the midst of the outcome and the discordant categorical determinants. logistic simple throw stern was apply to estimate the congeneric odds of having bullied others, for risk factors. 6. Conclusions The second supranational crowd on liberal arts and genial Sciences April 10th, 2010 module of braggy Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literary works Lifestyle_002 4 6. Identifying ballyrag outcome The tec hnique for identifying strong-arm outcome in this study is using statistical order factor analysis and old-hatized form as follows. The first method twisting an exploratory factor analyses using maximum likelihood method with varimax rotation, eigenvalue greater than one, and concomitant chargetals greater than 0. 30. Factor analysis resulted in the identification of 4some sheaths of ballyrag a stark fleshly intimidate factor comprising kick, hit, and bite, a baby bird hysical blusterous factor comprising push, throw something at, beat, pinch and scold, a psychological push around by maligning a nurture factor comprising hurt raises occupation, and malignment call downs name, and a psychological bully by maligning the student factor comprising tease students expression and insult students frugal status, as listed in tabular array 1. In the second method, the red-hot lashings for four lineamentfaces of boss around were calculated by using decided r afts to analyse with the criteria that were adapted from a Likert rating shell onuss 0. 00-0. 25 produced as 0, 0. 26-0. 50 leveld as 1, 0. 51-0. 5 scored as 2, and 0. 76-1. 00 scored as 3. The resulting in the altogether oodles were then as follows kick, hit, and bite 3, 3 and 1, respectively push, throw something at, beat, pinch and scold 3, 2, 2, 1 and 1, respectively insult parents occupation 3 and insult parents name 1 and sniffy students appearance is 3 and insulting students economic status 1. The resulting radical hit are listed in gameboard 1. Factor loading mental deterrence behaviour categories overserious Minor blustering(a) (Maligning physiologic corporal parent) intimidation determent Kick 0. 822 (3) touch 0. 825 (3) Bite 0. 380 (1) suggestion 0. 783 (3) Beat 0. 587 (2) consecrate something at 0. 07 (2) iron 0. 458 (1) Scold/ name-calling 0. 366 (1) maltreatment parents occupation 0. 878 (3) tease parents name 0. 399 (1) bruise economic status Insult appearance Eigenvalue 1. 85 1. 77 1. 21 departure explained 15. 4% 14. 7% 10. 1% notice Number in the ( ) is resulting pertly scores for each face of hector Psychological push around (Maligning student) 0. 765 (1) 0. 448 (1) 1. 01 8. 4% slacken 1 Factor loading scores and resulting new scores for each figure of determent The second International assembly on liberal arts and mixer Sciences April 10th, 2010 readiness of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs books Lifestyle_002 In the third base method, the lend scores for each fiber of strong-arm were calculated by using new scores for four types of blusterous. The resulting total scores are thence as follows serious animal(prenominal) bullying (scores 0-7) (3*hit) + (3*kick) + bite minor fleshly bullying (scores 0-9) (3*pinch) + (2*beat) + (2*throw something at) + push + scold psychological bullying by maligning a parent (scores 0-4) (3*insult parents occupations) + insult parents names and psychological bullying by maligning the student (scores 0-4) (3*insult students economic status) + insult students appearance.In the fourth method, the bullying scores were assay by corporate trust the total scores for each type of bullying serious visible bullying (scores 0-7) + minor corporal bullying (scores 0-9) + psychological bullying by maligning a parent (scores 0-4) + psychological bullying by maligning the student. The ordinal method, transform the bullying scores into Z-scores ( exchangeable to a mean of 0 and a defyard deviation of 1). Finally, the students were identify into two categories for bullying, bullied or not bullied. The students who had a regularize score greater than 1 were identified as a bully. 6. Descriptive statistics of bullying and risk factors The distributions of seven determinants in this study involved half of students creation from an urban school, 72. 2% were from public school, and 55. 4% were female. Slightly much than one third (34. 5%) were 8 days or less of age, 34. 0% were elder 9-10 age, and 31. 5% were 11 eld old or to a greater extent. Most of students (79. 7%) account that they had not witnessed corporal outcry betwixt their parents. tightly satisfactoryly half (48. 2%) of the students prefer enigma cartoons type, 26. 0% preferred action and 25. 8% comedy. Regarding number of near friends, 41. % had 3-5 soused friends, 32. 2% had two close friends or fewer and 26. 4% had sextet close friends or more than(prenominal) than. In this study, bullying outcome was identified as a divided variables not bullied others (1,139 students) and bullied others (301 students). The availing of students reporting that they had bullied others in school was 20. 9%. 6. 3 Associations amongst bullying and risk factors The associations between the outcome and the seven study determinants are shown in parry 2. Bullied behaviour Determinants School type Private ordinary School location Urban boorish non bullied (1,139) 78. 2 80. 0 82. 5 77. Had bullied (301) 21. 8 20. 0 17. 5 22. 2 Total (1,440) 50. 0 50. 0 0. 7 27. 8 72. 2 0. 399 Chisquared 3. 9 p-value 0. 049* The second International group on arts and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 stave of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literature Lifestyle_002 6 sex Female masculine eld group 8 yrs or less 9-10 yrs 11 yrs or more paternal natural demoralize non witnessed Witnessed cartoon type preference prank Action riddle Number of close friends 2 persons or less 3-5 persons 6 persons or more 31. 1 84. 5 72. 4 82. 9 79. 6 74. 4 87. 0 48. 1 86. 5 64. 5 83. 0 80. 6 80. 7 74. 7 15. 5 27. 17. 1 20. 4 25. 6 13. 0 51. 9 13. 5 35. 5 17. 0 19. 4 19. 3 25. 3 55. 4 44. 6 10. 3 34. 5 34. 0 31. 5 213. 5 79. 7 20. 3 66. 9 25. 8 26. 0 48. 2 5. 9 32. 2 41. 4 26. 4 0. 000** 0. 006** 0. 000** 0. 000** 0. 051 * p-value 0. 05 ** p-value 0. 01 Table 2 Associations between bullying and study determinants Table 2 shows that school type, gender, age group, agnate strong-arm pace, and cartoon type were potently associated with bullying. betting odds ratio plots of bullying categorized by five contrastive risk factors are shown in underframes 1. determent behaviour ( swaggering/not bullying) (Public/ Private) ( priapic/ Female) School type Witness/ not witness) sexuality Parental physical abuse Years Favorites cartoon type Age (group) resume type calculate 1 betting odds ratio plots of bullying categorized by four disparate risk factors The second International assemblage on liberal arts and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 cleverness of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs publications Lifestyle_002 7 Figures 1 shows that the students from public schools reported bullying others epoch-makingly more often than did students from secret schools (OR 1. 35, 95% CI 1. 01-1. 82). More males than females reported that they bullying others (OR 2. 07, 95% CI 1. 59-2. 69).The st udents who had witnessed physical abuse between their parents were more plausibly to be a bully than did those who had neer witnessed physical abuse between their parents (OR 7. 22, 95% CI 5. 39-9. 67). The students time-worn 11 years or more were more apparent to bully others than students aged 9-10 years and 8 years or less, (OR 1. 49, 95% CI 1. 13-1. 95). The students who preferred action cartoons tended to bully more than students who preferred brain-teaser or comedy cartoons (OR 2. 93, 95% CI 5. 39-9. 67). 6. 4 logistic regression analysis of bullying logistical regression was used to examine the association between bullying and risk factors.The results are shown in Table 3 and Figure 2. Table 3 shows the results of the logistic regression analysis after omitting determinants with p-values more than 0. 05 using backward elimination. In this reduced personate the four factors least significantly associated with the bullying are omitted. The smallest p-values indicate the factors most powerfully associated with the bullying were gender, age group, enatic physical abuse and cartoon type. Determinant Gender Female Male Age group 8 yrs or less 9-10 yrs 11 yrs or more Parental physical abuse Not witnessed Witnessed Cartoon type preference prank Action MysteryOR 0 1. 87 0 1. 29 1. 89 0 7. 11 0 2. 96 1. 33 (95% CI) p-value 0. 000 (1. 40,2. 50) 0. 000 0. 001 0. clx 0. 000 0. 000 0. 000 0. 000 0. 000 0. 147 (0. 90,1. 85) (1. 33,2. 69) (5. 26,9. 60) (1. 99,4. 43) (0. 90,1. 96) Table 3 Reduced representative of association between bullying and risk factors Figure 2 shows the odds ratio plot of the results from fitting the final logistic regression imitate. It was undercoat that witnessing agnate physical abuse was all the way the most potently associated determinant for bullying others.Students having witnessed parental physical abuse were more presumable 7. 11 time to bully others than were those who had neer witnessed parental physical The second International conclave on humanistic discipline and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 talent of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literary productions Lifestyle_002 8 abuse (95% CI 5. 26-9. 60). discernment for action cartoons was to a fault a major risk factor for bullying others students who preferred action cartoons tended to bully more than did students who preferred comedy cartoons (OR 2. 6, 95% CI 1. 99-4. 43). Among the age groups studied, older students (11+ years) were more presumable to be a bully than did younger students (8 years or less) 1. 89 times (95% CI 1. 33-2. 69). Males were 1. 87 times (95% CI 1. 40-2. 50) more likely to restrain reported having bullied others than were females. boss around others mystery Cartoon type action comedy Parental physical abuse yes no 11+ Age group 9-10 -8 boy Gender girl 1/8 1/4 1 2 4 8 Odds Ratio Figure 2 jeopardy factors of bullying in logistic regression final model 7.Discussion In this study, factor ana lysis and stockized score techniques were used to identify bullying outcome a student with a standardized score more than 1 was identified as a bully. victimisation an exploratory factor analysis for divided type of bullying is in conformism with a study by Parada et al (2005) in which six factors were attract up of 36 items. Beran (2005) raise four factors of 21 items. Carlyle and Steinman (2007) found two factors. apply a standardized score for identifying bullying in which a student with a standardized score more than 1 was identified as a bully (Scholte et al, 2007 Gini, 2008).In this study, the identifying techniques led to purposes that witnessing parental physical abuse and cartoon type were major risk factors for bullying. Witnessing parental physical abuse was all the way the most strongly associated determinant associate to bullying than those who had never witnessed parental physical abuse (7. 11 times more likely). Exposure to parental family ferocity has been found to be link up to negative behaviours of students the students who had witnessed parental physical abuse were more likely to bully others, when compared to those who had not itnessed parental physical abuse. This is in conformity with the studies of Herrera et al (2001) and Baldry (2003) who all reported that parental clay sculpture of onslaught The second International gathering on humanistic discipline and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 capacity of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs literary productions Lifestyle_002 9 and violence promotes the victimization of a childs negative behaviour the child aptitude reproduction the parents physical actions and might then befit a bully to gain victor in their own societal interactions.Preference for action cartoons was also super associated with bullying (2. 96 times more likely). This finding shows that the children who fascinate action cartoons or cartoon with superhero images were more likely to parade aggressive or bullying behaviour. This was lucid with the studies of Kirsch (2006) and Blumberg et al (2008), who argued that cartoon violence whitethorn also twist young viewers to transfer hostile acts from programs to realworld situations and has a significant additional way out in predicting bullying others.Students often likeness the physical actions of parents or of action cartoon characters and so through their life experiences reckon to be aggressive. By personally find others acting crisply to achieve some goal the children might learn to act acutely. With this modeling, the child might then become a bully to gain succeeder in his or her own social interactions. This explanation is in line with finding by Larson (2003) and Williams (2007) who found that children use the aforesaid(prenominal) aggressive tactic that they observe they learn to act aggressively when they model the behaviour of violent acts.The children are more likely to copy someone they are looking for at, and children have a greater inclination to imitate the modeling of those with whom they have the most contact (Cooke, 1993 Kirsch, 2006). 8. Recommendations 8. 1 Implications of the study This study showed that bullying is a serious worry in Pattani primary schools. Witnessing parental physical abuse and preferring action cartoons were the highest risk factors associated with bullying. Parents are the most outstanding persons in providing leading and direction for the productive prevention and interjection of bullying.They should append close attention and lambast regularly with their children around their feelings and kins with friends at school. They should work in league with the school to countenance irresponsible behaviour. Moreover, they must(prenominal) have patience, try to fend off using violence, and closely revalue and control the cartoon program viewing of their children. Findings from this study should suffice in the development of prevention and interpellation policies in the primary schools and assist educational authorities to introduce better strategies for reducing the problem.School administrators and teachers are the succeeding(a) most serious persons for preventing the prevalence of bullying in schools. The school environment should be salutary, not bad(p), and bullyfree. Teachers have to provide positive and ripe routine-modeling in techniques to students and teach them how to interact with one another. They should develop a program that teaches The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs Literature Lifestyle_002 0 students nearly the dangers of bullying, develop school strength in teaching bully-free practices and teach students about all forms of bullying verbal, emotional, psychological, and physical, as well as teach students about disadvantages of cartoon violence viewing and physica l abuse between parents. 8. 2 Recommendations for future day studies Results of our study say the extent of bullying in primary schools within Pattani obligation to be a serious problem.Future inquiry could focus on comparing prevalence rates among different types of schools or in one ad hoc type of school across districts within Pattani province or nearby provinces, such as Yala, Naratiwat, and Songkhla provinces. Results may give the incumbent information to teachers and administrators responsible for improving be consciousness programs, as well as continuing to educate our children in the off the hook(predicate)st and silk hat acquirement environment possible.In order for bullying to be prevented or decreased in our schools, school personnel choose to commit to the ideal that bullying is unacceptable, is serious, and should not be tolerated. hector is not a rite of passage that students must work out for themselves. When one sequent of bullying occurs it is serio us. curb from students does not demand acceptance. Teachers impoverishment genteelness that result help them to identify students who contain in silence. The facts of life needs to include strategies for victims as well as bullies. School personnel need to intervene appropriately in order to gain the confidence of the students.To gain that confidence, teachers need to be aware that victims of bullying who detain tongueless will rarely take the initiative to grade teachers they are universe bullied and would benefit from having someone pro-active and notice their circumstance and offer them help. in that location is also a large, silent absolute majority of bystanders in our schools. These students are usually well-developed socially but they do not dwell how to reclaim the power from the bullies. Some of these students may be terror-struck to confront the issue and thus push away or avoid bullying situations.If we can tap into this silent majority and teach these s tudents the skills they need, we can shape a positive school clime with this silent majority holding the power and helping to make the school safe and secure for all. get on research should examine specific teacher referrals after bullying incidents and whether there is a consistent method of reporting these incidents end-to-end the grade levels and among all teachers. The administration of disciplinary actions, when dealing with the types of bullying incidents should consistent throughout the school.An increase in student learning is an overall goal of this study. If students feel safe at school, if they are not maladjusted about the asynchronous transfer mode in which they learn, then greater student achievements will be likely to The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs Literature Lifestyle_002 11 exist. In order to make water and maintain a safe and orderly school e nvironment, all stakeholders must take an active role in combating the bullying problem in Pattani primary schools today. . References Baldry, A. C. 2003. Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. tike demoralise & Neglect, 27, 713732. Beale, A. 2001. Bully busters Using childs play to empower students to take a stand against bullying behaviour. sea captain School Counseling, 4, 300-306. Beran, T. 2005. A new persuasion on managing school bullying Pre-service teachers attitudes. journal of Social Science, 8 43-49. Besag, V. E. 2006. Understanding girls friendships, fights and feuds A practical arise to girls bullying. Milton Keynes Open University Press.Blumberg, F. C. , Bierwirth, K. P. 2008. Schwartz AJ. Does Cartoon Violence set out Aggressive mien in substantial Life? An opposing View. Early childhood Educ J. 2008 36 ci104. Carlyle, K. E. , and Steinman, K. J. 2007. Demographic differences in the prevalence, cooccurrence, and correlates of adolescent bull ying at school. daybook of School Health, 77 623-629. Cooke, P. 1993. TV causes violence? Says Who?. The peeled York Times. Craig, W. 1998. The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety and onslaught in bare(a) children.Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130. Egbochuku, E. O. 2007. Bullying in Nigerian schools Prevalence study and implications for counselling, J. Soc. Sci. , 14(1) 65-71. Farrington, D. P. 1993. Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds. ), abomination and jurist (Vol. 17). sugar University of Chicago Press. Gini, G. 2008. Associations between bullying behaviour, psychosomatic complaints, emotional and behavioural problems. daybook of Paediatrics and child Health. 44 492 497. Hawkins, D. L. , Pepler D. J. , and Craig, W. M. 001. representational observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10 (4) 512-527. Herrera, V. M. , and McCloskey, L. A. 2001. Gender differences in the r isk for delinquency among youth undefendable to family violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25 10371051. Junger, T. J. 1996. youthfulness and violence in Europe. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5(1) 31-58. The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs Literature Lifestyle_002 12 Kirsch, S. 2006.Cartoon violence and aggression in youth. onslaught and angry Behavior. 11 547557. Larson, M. S. 2003. Gender, Race, and Aggression in tv Commercials That Feature Children. stir Roles. 48 67-75. McNeil, D. 1996. epidemiologic research methods. New York John Wiley & Sons. Mouttapa, M. , Valente, T. , Gallaher, P. , Rohrbach, L. A. , and Unger, J. B. 2004. Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Adolescence, 39 315-336. Olweus, D. 1999. The personality of school bullying A cross-national perspective. capital of the United Kingdom Routledge. Parada, R. H. , Marsh, H. W . and Craven, R. G. 2005. There and back again from bully to victim and victim to bully A reciprocal effectuate model of bullying behaviours in schools. Sydney, Australia egotism Research Centre, University of horse opera Sydney. Scholte, R. J. , Engels, R. E. , Overbeek, G. , Kemp, R. T. , and Haselager, G. T. 2007. Stability in Bullying and using and its Association. daybook of abnormal Child Psychology, 35 217-228. Tapanya, S. 2006. A survey of bullying problem of students in Thailand. Chiang-Mai Faculty of Medicine, Chiang-Mai University. Veenstra, R. , Lindenberg, S. Oldehinkel, A. J. , De Winter, A. F. , Verhulst, F. C. , and Ormel, J. 2005. Bullying and victimization in dewy-eyed schools A proportion of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uncaring preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41 672-682. Wan Salwina, W. I. , Susan, M. K. , Nik Ruzyanei, N. J. , Tuti Iryani, M. D. , Syamsul, S. , Aniza, A. , and Zasmani, S. 2009. School bullying amongst standard students attending primary national schools in the federal dirt of Kuala Lumpur The prevalence and associated socio demographic factors, Malaysian ledger of Psychiatry, 18(1) 5-12.Williams, G. 2007. Gabriel Tarde and the Imitation of Deviance. usable at http//www. criminology. fsu. edu/crimtheory/ tarde. htm. Accessed date September 21, 2007. Wolke, D. , Woods, S. , Stanford, K. , and Schulz, H. 2001. Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology. 92 673696. The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs Literature Lifestyle_002 13